I Got An 'A' In Wellness


I just completed my BCBS Health and Wellness Assessment - okay, it's not an 'A'. It's an 'A-'.

             

Here's something interesting - they say that my wellness score has decreased since my last test (a year ago) - but they don't say WHY it decreased. They didn't say that I was fatter, or under more stress, or had higher triglycerides - they just said "decreased".

Maybe they are just doing it subtly, through suggesting a course of action? They have three programs to recommend:

1) Weight Loss
2) Healthy Aging
3) Cancer-Fighting

I can see the weight-loss thing; after this motorcycle accident, I suspect that I'm carrying a good bit more fat than is healthy. I suppose that I'm like most people in this respect - but I don't wanna be! And I'm not supposed to be! - excuse me. That just burst out there. I'm all calm now - much better.

The "healthy aging" program sounds like

a) an insult, and
b) a good idea.

I don't like typing that business about it being a good idea, at all, but obviously I have some issues with aging. And, equally obviously, it's not something that I'm going to be able to avoid (and stay alive, that is. I will admit that I find it interesting that I'm in a culture that is, by and large, Judeo-Christian, but it seems to be a nearly-unanimous opinion that "old is better than dead". Do these folks simply deny a belief in an afterlife? Or do they think that fear is fun? )

 That last one - cancer-fighting. I wonder why that's in there? Is it simply a default suggestion? Or is there something that I should be worried about? I've mentioned before in these pages that my family - extended, on both sides - are nigh-on cancer free; it took my uncle Harry (the lone exception)  some sixty-odd years of chewing tobacco before he got cancer at the age of 81. The rest of 'em - not a carcinoma in the carful.

"To be or not to be - that is the question.
Whether 'tis nobler in the hearts and minds of men
To suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune
Or to take up arms against a sea of troubles
And, by opposing, end them..."

I've always thought that Will was talking about acceptance vs. change - acceptance being the suffering of the slings and arrows, and change being the "take up arms against" part. I don't think that "suffer" necessarily means "endure the pain of" as much as it means "allow", as in "suffer the little children to come unto me".

I come from a spiritual discipline which teaches acceptance rather than change - that is, unless the thing that is being changed is my own outlook. So the cancer-fighting program is probably not for me, but the aging healthily program is probably a good idea.

And I reckon I orta give the weight-loss program a look see, while I'm at it.
 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 6/4/2010 10:30 AM chris yet again wrote:
    The cancer thing is probably because you didn't check the right boxes about eating lots of fiber.

    You're looking at it from the wrong end.

    (is my guess)
    Reply to this
    1. 6/4/2010 10:32 AM Fat Charlie the Archangel wrote:
      That's possible, but I didn't get questions about FIBER.

      I did get one about FRUIT, and I answered as large a number of servings as they gave - I eat several cups of frozen strawberries per night : )

      The whole wheat question, however, might have caused the same response - thanks for the insight.
      Reply to this
  • 9/13/2010 12:29 PM Mark wrote:
    Aging healthily is scary for everyone. It just sounds like such a tall order. It's the pressure to maintain health amidst deterioration, to win the battle against gravity and somehow ease the weight of death. That's an intimidating thought for anyone. I guess that's why we have medical insurance.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.